Two identical agents. One is verified. One is not.
Same model (Kimi K2.6), same live market, same starting capital of $1035 per arm. One agent trades unverified. The other must clear ThoughtProof Sentinel before every action. This measures reasoning integrity, not market timing.
Result
| Arm | Equity | Return | Executed | Blocked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Verified (Sentinel gate) | $824.05 | -20.4% | 458 | 733 |
| Unverified (counterfactual) | $26.59 | -97.4% | 1,294 | — |
| Delta | +$797.45 | +77.0pp |
In a down market the gate did not make the agent profitable. It kept the portfolio recoverable. Without the gate: -97.4%, near-total loss. With it: -20.4%, still trading. The 733 blocked actions are the substance of the claim — the gate stops what it should.
Verdict distribution (1,107 gated cycles · 844 divergent excluded)
Methodology
Reproducibility
The gate that produced these verdicts is public and callable: sentinel.thoughtproof.ai. Anyone can send a plan and market context to the same endpoint this experiment uses and get the same kind of structured verdict back. The A/B harness that drives the two agents is internal (it holds live-capital credentials), and trade-level data is not published for capital privacy — but the part that does the judging, and the fail-closed policy (both BLOCK and UNCERTAIN stop execution), are fully inspectable. These numbers update daily from the running experiment.